首页> 外文OA文献 >Capacity payments to secure electricity supply? On the future of Germany’s power market design
【2h】

Capacity payments to secure electricity supply? On the future of Germany’s power market design

机译:支付容量以确保电力供应?关于德国电力市场设计的未来

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although the objectives of the Energiewende (energy transition) are broadly accepted in Germany, the practical ways of\udachieving them remain highly contentious. In particular, the question of whether and how security of supply can\udbe guaranteed over the course of this profound transformation of the energy system is currently the subject of\udcontroversy in the scientific and public debate. Recently, calls for additional payments to power plant operators\udfor providing generation capacity have grown increasingly loud. But the introduction of capacity payments of this sort\udcould have far-reaching consequences for the future organisation of Germany’s electricity supply. Therefore, the political\uddecision on this issue - which is scheduled for this year - should not be made without a sound scientific analysis.\udBasically, measures aimed at guaranteeing security of supply must address the possible causes of capacity shortages as\udbroadly as possible. When designing such measures, besides security of supply, additional objectives such as\udcost-effectiveness and the environmental and social acceptability of electricity supply should also be taken into\udaccount. Capacity payments only partially meet these requirements. Moreover, once introduced, they are difficult to adapt,\udor revise even, to suit changing framework conditions. This is particularly problematic in view of the current lack of clear\udevidence for future security of supply problems. Therefore, introducing capacity payments at this point in time would not\udappear to be constructive. It would make more sense to introduce instead a mix of measures which would strengthen\udthe electricity market, create conditions for feeding in electricity from renewable energy sources as and when required,\udand set incentives for the expansion of grid capacity, storage systems and demand side management. Should security of\udsupply still appear uncertain under these changed framework conditions, the introduction of a strategic reserve, which\udwould be held by the regulatory authority or the transmission system operator, is recommended - not, however,\udthe creation of an entirely new, additional market segment in the form of a capacity market.
机译:尽管Energiewende(能源转型)的目标在德国已被广泛接受,但实现这些目标的实际方法仍然存在很大争议。特别是,在能源系统的深刻变革过程中,是否以及如何保证供应安全的问题目前是科学界和公众辩论中的争论主题。最近,要求发电厂运营商支付额外费用以提供发电能力的呼声越来越高。但是这种容量支付的引入可能对德国未来的电力供应组织产生深远的影响。因此,计划在今年进行的关于这个问题的政治\决定,除非经过合理的科学分析。\ ud基本上,旨在保证供应安全的措施必须尽可能广泛地解决产能短缺的可能原因。 。在设计此类措施时,除了要保证供电安全外,还应考虑其他目标,例如\成本效益,电力供应的环境和社会可接受性。容量付款仅部分满足这些要求。而且,一旦引入,它们很难适应甚至修改以适应不断变化的框架条件。鉴于当前缺乏对未来供应安全问题的明确证据,这尤其成问题。因此,在这个时间点引入容量支付似乎不会具有建设性。取而代之的是,引入一系列措施来增强电力市场,在必要时为从可再生能源中获取电力创造条件,并为扩大电网容量,存储系统和需求设置激励措施方面的管理。如果在这些变化的框架条件下供应的安全性仍不确定,则建议引入战略储备,该储备应由监管机构或传输系统运营商持有-但是,不建议建立全新的储备,以产能市场的形式出现的其他细分市场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号